Packers chat with Ryan Wood
Jan. 9 transcript
3rd & 7 37yd
3rd & 7 37yd
B
S
O
close
close

-





-
-
Hey folks, welcome to our Monday afternoon live chat. I'm not qualified to analyze Al Harris' game, because I never covered him. With that said, Panama Jeff, he's exactly who came to my mind watching LaDarius Gunter last night. Like Harris, Gunter is a tough, physical, gritty corner. A good guy to have in your secondary, for sure.
-
No doubt you'll get questions asking for the status of Jordy, Rollins and Blake for next week. I know we don't know that yet. What are your thoughts on Mike Pennel? Will he be added to the roster to help defend against Dallas's premier rushing attack? If so, who will be removed from the roster? The injuries noted above play into it, but assuming they don't want to drop those players who would you see? Callahan or Starks maybe? Or are we better off saying no thanks to Pennel?
-
That's a good question, Justin. The wild-card game was always going to be about DBs. The Packers had five DBs play 100 percent of the snaps yesterday. Which means they were always in nickel. This would be a good week for an extra defensive lineman. So if Mike Pennel is going to be activated again this season without injuries on the D line playing a factor, I would expect it to be this week. Even though the Cowboys have Dez Bryant, it's definitely a different task this week gearing up against the Cowboys talented offensive line and rookie running back.
-
-
Well it definitely doesn't make things easy. Even if the Packers are without Jordy Nelson this week (which is certainly possible), their depth of weapons makes them difficult to defend. They have two guys in Ty Montgomery and Randall Cobb who can play anywhere. Even Davante Adams lined up in the backfield some this season, though that's way back in the playbook. Give a guy like Aaron Rodgers that much versatility around him, and it should work well.
-
-
-
I know you will receive many comments/questions on MM's "BONE HEAD" call on fourth down, both call to go and play called where horrible, doesn't MM have a coach/someone next to him to remind him of stupid calls and time management, when I worked on Hank Stram's staff in the 60' as an intern some one was appointed to do that Which is I MM too self centered to ask for help or just plain dumb'
-
It was a really bad decision, and McCarthy sorta admitted that after the game. I think he knew. The worst part, to me, was even if you get the fourth down, you're still far from scoring position. The reward simply did not match the risk. What's funny is this is a coach that's been branded as "conservative" in the playoffs, a tag I've never thought accurately fit. Think we saw that last night. Every coach makes mistakes. Doubt McCarthy repeats it again in these playoffs.
-
Hi Ryan,
For a year, year and a half the story was the Packers’ receivers could not get open or create separation, did not know how to run routes, lacked skill/speed, Nelson was washed up, Adams was a wasted pick, etc.; and the problem was exacerbated by the Packers’ offense, it’s lack of imagination, other teams had caught on, etc. Now, however, the Packers have an offense scoring 30+ points repeatedly and it was clear on more than a few plays that the WRs were definitely getting open, often times very early in their routes.
It’s still the same group of receivers so other than Rodgers playing like an MVP, what has changed that they now are able to do things they seemingly couldn’t before? Thank you! -
I still go back to, simply, the quarterback is playing better. Even when the Packers receivers aren't getting open, Aaron Rodgers is throwing them open. Perfect example was Rodgers' first touchdown pass to Davante Adams yesterday. Go back and look at that play. Adams is not open. It's a touchdown anyway. That's the type of throw we simply did not see from Rodgers for basically a calendar year, a throw only he and maybe one or two other quarterbacks can make. It's why it never made sense to me that the receivers were a huge problem. A great quarterback makes average receivers good, good receivers great. I think we're seeing that now with Rodgers.
-
-
Well, other than the biggest key you mentioned, I'm curious to see if this secondary can cover Dez Bryant, Cole Beasley and Terrance Williams. I also wonder if the Packers might be able to jump on them early. Remember, not only are the Cowboys inexperienced at key positions, but they're coming off three weeks of rest and might have some rust. If the Packers can take advantage of that, it could help them control the game. Ultimately, there's a real chance this game develops into a shootout, and you have to like red-hot Aaron Rodgers over a rookie quarterback in a game like that. So there are a few reasons to like the Packers. Now, to see why the Cowboys will still be favored, go take a look at this year's All-Pro and Pro Bowl lists.
-
How do you see the defense lining up this week? I feel like they might need to bring burnett in the box to try and stop the run. Also what are the strengths of the cowboys defense? If the giants were the top defensive team and we put 38 up we should be able to duplicate that.
-
Don't know about Morgan Burnett as a linebacker, but certainly I could see the Packers play him more in the box and go with a one-high safety, shading Ha Ha Clinton-Dix toward Dez Bryant's side to help with LaDarius Gunter. Wouldn't it be interesting to see Clay Matthews play inside linebacker this week against the run? I'm just spit balling there, but the Cowboys are an ideal opponent to force that change. Key will be beefing up the box, while not forfeiting pass rush and getting beat deep.
-
-
I generally think cold weather helps the team that runs better, which is the Cowboys. This Packers passing game on a fast track indoors should help them continue their roll. Of course, that goes both ways, and the Cowboys are obviously capable of making plays with their passing game as well. Still, I think the Packers would prefer to make Dak Prescott beat them.
-
-
-
-
-
-
The Packers profile exactly like a team that gets hot at the right time and can't be stopped in the playoffs. We've seen it happen many years. Heck, the Packers have seen it happen to them in the past. Doesn't mean they will make a run to the Super Bowl, but they're the team nobody wants to play right now. That should give you some hope.
-
Wide Receiver is looking like it’s going to be another tough decision next season. There will be Nelson, Cobb, Adams, Montgomery (assuming they move him back to WR) Allison, Janis and Davis plus there will be the inevitable draft pick of a WR and the myriad of undrafted free agent WRs that Thompson will bring in.
-
Why do you assume they move Montgomery back to receiver? There's been no official word for next season, but that would surprise me. He's a good running back, and the Packers (as you noted) have plenty of receivers. Wouldn't be surprised if they keep six next year, with Montgomery as a tailback. But there's a long, long, long way until next year.
-
-
-
I actually liked the call to go for it on fourth and 1. Too often MM has played too conservative. I like the guts. I just hated the play call. spread them out and qb sneak or run rip. Or bootleg and get AR on the edge. But dont play smash mouth football that doesn't work. Thoughts?
-
I'm not adverse to going for it on fourth down. Again, the issue was there wasn't much reward. Even if you convert, you still haven't even crossed midfield. Your defense is controlling the game, you have an 8-point lead in the second half, and you can pin a bad Giants defense deep. That's what needs to be done.
-
If Beckham catches half the throws he had a shot and cook catches the pass before the hail mary that would have ended the half the packers are down quite a bit at half. Maybe 14-7 or worse. They should be lucky some things went their way early or the outcome may have been very different.
-
-
-
I'm leaning toward it being unlikely Julius Peppers is back, but it can't be ruled out. He had 7.5 sacks this year, and he's clearly a prominent leader in the locker room. Doubt he'd agree to the right deal, but who knows. As for limiting the snaps, he played almost 3/4 of them yesterday and, as Letroy Guion said, he looked in his mid-20s. Would have to think the plan worked.
-
-
-
-
All of the above? Hard to tell, but I'd lean toward it being a combination of factors. As for the significance, the key to the game might be the Giants only holding a 6-0 lead. The Packers were thoroughly outplayed in the first quarter, but still in the game. When they lead 14-6 at halftime after being dominated much of the first half, I was pretty sure the Giants had blown it.
-
-
-
-
Truth is, the offensive line has had a great season. Worthy of more than one Pro Bowler. Especially with left tackle David Bakhtiari a second-team All-Pro. As far as stopping the Cowboys, think the Packers are hoping for a mistake from their rookie quarterback. Could happen, but Dak Prescott has been solid much of the year.
-
-
The thing that stuck with me this morning was the Packers just scored 38 points in a blowout to win a playoff game in which they once trailed 194-7 in yardage, and they did it without Jordy Nelson against perhaps the best secondary in the NFC. That, to me, is a testament to how explosive this team is right now. The first half was bad, and sure there's reason to concern. If the Packers can't cover better this week, it'll be a problem. But yesterday was impressive.
-
-
None yet. We'll be speaking with Mike McCarthy in 15 minutes, so you can be sure he'll be asked about Nelson then. With that said, it's time for me to run. Thanks to everyone who participated in today's live chat. Make sure to get all your Packers coverage at PackersNews.com. Until next time, take care.